Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 12th Apr 2012 08:59 UTC
Internet & Networking I would honestly serve at the altar of the person that did this. Keep the debugging information, but for the love of god, make your email client do something pretty and useful with it.
Permalink for comment 513915
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
tupp
Member since:
2006-11-12

And the world would be much improved in general if people would must use their brains more -- it won't hurt to much to try to read and understand the horrible "machine" response.

If everyone thought like this, we would be still using DOS.

That's like saying, "if everyone knew math, we would still be using pen and paper to calculate, instead of calculators or spreadsheets."

No. If people used their brains more, we would probably have greater advancements, and people wouldn't have to schedule an appointment at the "Genius" bar every time they need to have their fly zipped.


I cannot fathom why anyone would think that displaying a friendly error is a bad idea.

Because it uses more resources, and it is unnecessary, if one merely reads the text error.

Also, using a "friendly," interactive, graphical interface in place of something that is easily explained in a brief text message tends to make Johnny stupid and helpless.


You are also assuming that someone using the client has a conceptual understanding of how email works, beyond "I create a message and send it".

Somehow the point was missed. I am not assuming anything -- I am suggesting that we put efforts in to educating people in basic computer literacy and that we encourage people to think.


Whether it is feasible is an entirely differently subject.

Educating people in rudimentary literacy is certainly feasible. Literacy was much greater in the middle of the 20th century (when there were no GUIs).

Likewise, there have been several ages of enlightenment and independent thinking, throughout history.

Edited 2012-04-12 20:39 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 4