Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 12th Apr 2012 19:05 UTC
Legal "Former Goldman Sachs programmer Sergey Aleynikov, who downloaded source code for the investment firm's high-speed trading system from the company's computers, was wrongly charged with theft of property because the code did not qualify as a physical object under a federal theft statute, according to a court opinion published Wednesday." This could be a huge deal, if it ever were to be upheld in higher courts. More specifically, "because Aleynikov did not 'assume physical control' over anything when he took the source code, and because he did not thereby 'deprive [Goldman] of its use', Aleynikov did not violate the [National Stolen Property Act]". Well paint me purple with white and red dots and call me a girl scout.
Permalink for comment 514188
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Makes sense
by The123king on Sat 14th Apr 2012 18:16 UTC in reply to "RE: Makes sense"
Member since:

The closest thing I think he can be charged for is copyright infringement, seeing as theft "is the taking of another person's property without that person's permission or consent with the intent to deprive the rightful owner of it" and copyright infringement "is the unauthorized use of works under copyright, infringing the copyright holder's "exclusive rights", such as the right to reproduce or perform the copyrighted work, spread the information contained within copyrighted works, or to make derivative works."

Seeing as the source code was never taken on someone elses pendrive or CD, the only real crime commited would be that of copyright infringement.

(text in quotes taken from the Wikipedia articles on the relevant subjects)

Edited 2012-04-14 18:17 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1