Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 16th Apr 2012 02:08 UTC
Permalink for comment 514321
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-18
--The loon
It doesn't matter because it's the published results that matter, and if the results are wrong, someone can verify it independently when its published. If you use the original source code, to verify, it's no longer independent.
In a research organization where there are hundreds of people pulling in open source code, you cannot guarantee someone did not pull code from the original base, leading to a compromised verification of the data.