Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Apr 2012 17:05 UTC
Permalink for comment 515006
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-05-06
The largest problem I see is that the real world part is only implemented as far as it isn't very hard to do. Yet the harder things aren't implemented at all, or in such a way that it is half analogy, half cyberian.
Take something simple like a PDF or eBook reader. On real books, I have an edge where I can immediately go somewhere near a page - It is the edge opposite the spine. Also sometimes the spine gets cracked so my favorite pages are stickier and I can feel or see them.
There is nothing like that on any reader I can find. There is some way of navigating, usually involving scrolling - somehow I can read the "book" as if it were on a roll of paper and have to drag/spin it a great deal to get to something near the end. Or switch modes and find a seek box.
Pick ONE paradigm, and floodfill all the features that make sense into it. If something important doesn't fit, switch paradigms, or admit you will have a clunky and hard to use but pretty UI.