Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 17th Apr 2012 21:57 UTC, submitted by Drake
Permalink for comment 515058
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-12-15
Indeed.
It seems you forgot the key point which make the difference between an actual patent troll and a company such as the one you mentioned:
"with no intention to further develop, manufacture or market the patented invention"
And you miss the key word:
"often with no intention".
It fascinates me how hard some people try not to have to accept reality. Quite entertaining.
I think you missed the key phrase
"who buys and enforces patents"
Most of the companies listed didn't buy the the patents they are enforcing. They were granted/given the patents.They are the original patent holders.
Tolls buy up other people's patents then enforce them.
Edited 2012-04-21 07:47 UTC