Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 21st Apr 2012 19:25 UTC
Permalink for comment 515171
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-25
The BSD license is completely open source - it is pretty close the the epitome of the concept. The GPL, while having it's uses, is far less "open" if being open is your main goal. I'm not saying that the GPL is bad - but it is most definitely more constraining.
Um... No. Why would I?
To clarify, if I released a project under the BSD license that means I am fully aware of that being a possibility. If limiting the ability for others to profit from my work was my goal I would choose another license (like the GPL) or maybe just keep it to myself. The point is not everyone has the same priorities...
Who cares? You think most people starting BSD projects are in it for the money???
If seems to me that thoughts concerning correct reward for ones work don't enter into it for most BSD folks - they aren't doing it for the payday.
One man's abuse is another man's reward... Not everyone is motivated by greed, for some people just having their work flourish is enough for them. Why hate on the unselfish?
Edited 2012-04-22 05:34 UTC