Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 21st Apr 2012 19:25 UTC
GNU, GPL, Open Source "A new analysis of licensing data shows that not only is use of the GPL and other copyleft licenses continuing to decline, but the rate of disuse is actually accelerating." This shouldn't be surprising. The GPL is complex, and I honestly don't blame both individuals and companies opting for simpler, more straightforward licenses like BSD or MIT-like licenses.
Permalink for comment 515212
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: hm?
by kwan_e on Sun 22nd Apr 2012 12:22 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: hm?"
Member since:

"the problem with GPL is V3 which is as anti-business as RMS could possibly make it.

Please point out how GPLv3 is extremely 'anti-business' as opposed to GPLv2? The major changes to GPLv3 was that it strenghtened the patent protection and prevented tivo-ization, the latter is the one which Linus strongly objected too and the one thing which could be concieved as anti-business, however that only apply to tivo-style business (not allowing the end user to run their own versions of software on a system).

You illustrate an important point. To a business person, any competition is anti-business, because to a business person, the only business that matters is their business. If something hurts their competitors but not them, they'll say it's fine, while their competitor will say it's anti-business.

Business and financial people are sharks, the lot of them. Trust them only as far as they trust you.

Reply Parent Score: 1