Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Apr 2012 20:09 UTC, submitted by fran
Linux "Linux vendor Canonical said it has 'no interest' in Linux kernel development. Two weeks ago a Linux Foundation report showed that since version 2.6.32, Microsoft had committed more code to the Linux kernel than Canonical. Since then, Canonical has faced claims from rivals that it does not contribute to Linux as much as it should given its popularity. Recently Canonical founder Mark Shuttleworth told The Inquirer that his company has no interest in contributing to the Linux kernel." Why is this such a bad thing? You can contribute more to open source than code alone. Like, I don't know, users?
Permalink for comment 515289
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by BallmerKnowsBest
by Delgarde on Sun 22nd Apr 2012 23:35 UTC in reply to "RE: Comment by BallmerKnowsBest"
Delgarde
Member since:
2008-08-19

Ahahaha, two downmods already? Thanks for proving my point, guys.


You'll forgive us for thinking that someone calling himself "Ballmer knows best" might be a troll?

Reply Parent Score: 3