Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 21st Apr 2012 19:25 UTC
Permalink for comment 515499
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-04-11
Simple, companies like Google do want to support open source or mostly open source projects. but they also want a pull back plan.
I actually like the GPL, because once it's open source, it will always be (I don't care about the amount of words in the license, I ll leave that to lawyers). The only way to make a GPL piece of software closed again is to write it from scratch.
But we 've got to be realists. Open source is a radical model (you 've got to give your product away, everyone can get it with one recompile, and you 've got to give people permission to change it and redistribute), so it's understandable companies that go for it want a pull back plan.