Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Apr 2012 20:09 UTC, submitted by fran
Permalink for comment 515543
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-01-16
Using all the Ubuntu logic here...PCLinuxOS has brought just as much to the Linux desktop that Canonical has.
Afterall, they've provided an excellent desktop for end users that is solid and less buggy than any others out there.
So...what we're really arguing about here is what Canonical AS A COMPANY does to support Linux. Providing end users a nice GUI is great...but it's no different than a mom and pop distro like PCLinuxOS can provide. What sets them apart? Right now, the only thing I can see that sets them apart from others is that they appear to do more...we have nothing other than people with opinions to substantiate what they acutally do.
In other words, we need more data. Just looking at the data makes Red Hat/Fedora in the pole position with Ubuntu laps and laps behind. Ubuntu isn't doing itself any favors with comments like the one Mark let fly.