Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Apr 2012 08:51 UTC
Permalink for comment 515597
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-07
It's a little late for this year's April fools joke, isn't it. I groan every time I hear this "let's mine the moon and/or asteroids".
Mining the moon might be just barely feasible if we ever get fusion to work. Unless that happens, there just isn't anything on the moon that isn't more abundant (and infinitely more accessible) on Earth. The cost of mining anything on the moon will be ridiculously high, and the enormous amount of energy resources needed to establish and operate a mining colony on the moon makes it prohibitive unless the moon can produce energy in abundance.
In other words, build a functioning fusion reactor first. No one has yet been able to do so despite decades of trying. I expect to grow old and die before it happens. If/when controlled fusion is proven feasible, then it might be worth reconsidering moon mining.
But mining asteroids is even more farfetched. Unlike the moon they do not stay in a nice neat orbit around the earth. Rather, they hurl through space at high speed - if anyone thinks NASA can chase one down with the space shuttle and snag it like a cowboy ropes a cow has been watching too many Star Wars movies.
Edited 2012-04-24 21:47 UTC