Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Apr 2012 20:36 UTC
Google I wasn't just wrong, I was being an idiot. "When Google was in the thick of Android's development in 2006 and 2007 - long before the platform ever reached retail - it was a very different product, almost unrecognizable compared to the products we used today. Documents dated May of 2007 and made public during the course of Oracle's lawsuit against Google over its use of Java in Android show off a number of those preliminary user interface elements, prominently marked 'subject to change', and you can see how this used to be a product focused on portrait QWERTY devices." I'm hoping I can dive into this a little deeper tomorrow; since it's the busiest period of the year for my little company right now, I don't have the time to do it today. Just to make sure nobody thinks I'm just going to ignore this, I figured it'd be a good idea to post a quickie today. I'll get back to this tomorrow, or Friday at the latest.
Permalink for comment 515735
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: I WANT THAT PHONE
by WorknMan on Wed 25th Apr 2012 23:02 UTC in reply to "I WANT THAT PHONE"
WorknMan
Member since:
2005-11-13

But, I don't want variety I want something that works well with useful apps built in for message, calendar, email, and rss/atom is the only web I care about when on the road. I never had a blackberry, but I loved my wife's Nokia E71 and my N85. I can message so much faster using T9 with predictive text on a 9 key than I ever could on a touch screen.


Well, those plus GPS, and Google Voice.

Reply Parent Score: 2