Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Apr 2012 17:39 UTC
Permalink for comment 515773
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-06-18
Some people have suggested client-side encryption to work around the privacy issue.
But while eCryptFS, encfs, TrueCrypt and 7Zip-AES provide some protection (depending on the strength of your password), they also defeat one of the points of cloud storage. You cannot search or modify your stuff online or without downloading and decrypting everything first. So your new and shiny cloud storage turns into a dumb data sink.
And Google pushes this far more than their competition, using OCR on scanned PDFs for example, or allowing online collaborative editing of documents.
Solutions like privacy homomorphisms exist to address this problem, but they are not generally used yet and they come with major drawbacks attached.