Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Apr 2012 20:36 UTC
Google I wasn't just wrong, I was being an idiot. "When Google was in the thick of Android's development in 2006 and 2007 - long before the platform ever reached retail - it was a very different product, almost unrecognizable compared to the products we used today. Documents dated May of 2007 and made public during the course of Oracle's lawsuit against Google over its use of Java in Android show off a number of those preliminary user interface elements, prominently marked 'subject to change', and you can see how this used to be a product focused on portrait QWERTY devices." I'm hoping I can dive into this a little deeper tomorrow; since it's the busiest period of the year for my little company right now, I don't have the time to do it today. Just to make sure nobody thinks I'm just going to ignore this, I figured it'd be a good idea to post a quickie today. I'll get back to this tomorrow, or Friday at the latest.
Permalink for comment 515944
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Why Steve hates android
by karunko on Fri 27th Apr 2012 12:39 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: Why Steve hates android"
karunko
Member since:
2008-10-28

What changed things, disrupted the phone market and led to a widespread mutation in phone design was the iPhone.

I already made clear that, as a consumer, I couldn't care less about who copies who, and I have no problem saying that there's a lot to like about the iPhone but... Disrupted? Widespread mutation?!?

Please, tell me you're shooting for a job with Apple's PR department rather than being just pathetic! ;-)


RT.

Reply Parent Score: 2