Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 29th Apr 2012 10:16 UTC, submitted by xerverius
Permalink for comment 516267
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-01-21
But you're right, as fast and stable as Xfce is even on older hardware, LXDE is even faster. If you don't need the extra features Xfce has over LXDE, you'll probably find the latter to be a better fit. Personally, I prefer Xfce by a wide margin, but LXDE is a great desktop in its own right.
*nod* I used to run Konqueror 3.5 under desktops like GNOME, Xfce, and a homemade Fluxbox-centered mixture back in the days before I found less gaudy KDE 3.5 theming resources.
Once I did find better theming options, I was a loyal KDE 3.5 user.
I switched to LXDE when I finally couldn't wait for KDE 4 to become fast and stable any longer (somewhere around KDE 4.4) and GTK+ had finally fixed the Save/Load dialog to perform well.
LXDE has its annoying flaws, but since they're actually GNOME-inspired "features" in GTK+ common dialogs, Xfce wouldn't fix them.
(Stuff like buggy keyboard support, forcing "Open" to start in the "Recently Used" section with buggy support for being emptied, lacking "show this bookmark only in this application", and having neither "Delete" and "Rename" context menu entries nor an "Open in File Manager" one.)
Edited 2012-04-30 01:52 UTC