Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Apr 2012 11:53 UTC
Permalink for comment 516458
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
God forbid any company protect its patents.
"any company protect its bogus patents" ... there, I fixed it for you.
B&N had already managed to get most of the Microsoft patents thrown out, invalidated or withdrawn by Microsoft in the Microsoft vs B&N case. Linux simply does not infringe any of Microsoft's valid patents. Linux and Windows are fundamentally different technologies, so Linux does not use Windows methods of doing things.
This is a good move from Microsoft (well, perhaps a little transparent and reeking of desperation) in its quest to continue to pretend that Linux (allegedly) infringes on Microsoft IP.
Microsoft should give up this farce IMO. It not only gives Microsoft very bad PR, but it makes them look both desperate and fraudulent.