Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Apr 2012 11:53 UTC
Permalink for comment 516679
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-09-01
You (unintentionally) hit the nail! They are protecting their patents (by not disclosing them) so that they can continue blackmailing companies that are poorly legally entrenched in the US. Why, because their *IP rights* standing behind those patents doesn't exist. Seing how US govt. looks through fingers at these practices starts to resemble how Russian govt. treats Gazprom.