Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 2nd May 2012 22:32 UTC, submitted by PLan
Permalink for comment 516881
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-10-02
That's exactly what the court did, and I'm surprised it was even necessary. Laws in EU are quite simple and awfully clear in this regard. An API is not copyrightable, but the implementation of the API is.
Or put differently: You can create headerfiles with the same names and with the same name for methods and variables, but the code must be different, since the code (the total combination) is copyrightable.