Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 2nd May 2012 22:32 UTC, submitted by PLan
Legal "The European Court of Justice ruled on Wednesday that application programming interfaces and other functional characteristics of computer software are not eligible for copyright protection. Users have the right to examine computer software in order to clone its functionality - and vendors cannot override these user rights with a license agreement, the court said." Bravo. A landmark ruling, for sure. If the US courts decide in favour of Oracle in the Google-Oracle case, Europe would instantly become an even friendlier place for technology companies.
Permalink for comment 516981
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: NOT APIs
by Slambert666 on Fri 4th May 2012 03:02 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: NOT APIs"
Slambert666
Member since:
2008-10-30

The GPL doesn't cover the arrangement of interfaces in a library (i.e. it's API) - it only covers the underlying source code and its binary representation when run.


So if I only include the header files from a GPL licensed library my code does not become GPL, because the copyright does not cover the header files, hmmmm.

I believe you will find that the FSF has a radically different interpretation of that specific issue, because that is exactly the purpose of the GPL, and the whole reason for the LGPL is that you cannot link to a GPL licensed library neither static or dynamic without being covered by the GPL itself. If you are telling the truth and not just lying in order to win the argument, then why does the LGPL even exist?

Reply Parent Score: 1