Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 2nd May 2012 22:32 UTC, submitted by PLan
Permalink for comment 516982
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-10-30
Galvanash is misrepresenting the case, he basically says that the GPL never covered dynamic linking, and that is a radically different interpretation than for example the FSF has.
i.e. the problem in a nutshell:
1. if you cannot copyright the API, can you then copyright the files that express that API? and only that API? (ie. the header files).
2. If you cannot copyright either, then can I include only the header files from a GPL covered library in my non GPL (say BSD or proprietary licensed) project?