Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 4th May 2012 18:16 UTC
Permalink for comment 517134
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-01
I have been reading the comments here and I can see how some people are defending MS for their decision "XP didn't have it either", "not a big deal", you can just install a virus pa...I mean a codec pack....
Yes, yes I agree that is indeed very simple but what makes me upset is the principle being used. An upgrade should *not* take features away. There is NO excuse for taking features away, period. Perhaps, a feature can be disabled so it does not take resources or whatever but definitely shout be there. A perfect example for this would be the telnet client. It was enabled by default in XP but in Windows 7 (and may be Vista, don't know) it is not enabled and you have to go to Programs and Features to enable it.
Edited 2012-05-05 04:26 UTC