Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 5th May 2012 02:56 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless Ron Amadeo argues that the SIII is ugly because it was designed by lawyers. "So there you have it. A darn-near perfect explanation of the GSIII design. Sure, it's butt ugly, but it's also 100% (well maybe 90%) lawyer approved. An amorphous, unsymmetrical blob that doesn't come in black, with a non-permanent dock and non-square icons. There's no way Apple can add this design to their Samsung lawsuit." Sure would explain how Samsung went from the elegantly understated SII to this monstrosity of a phone. Anyone out there who actually likes the SIII's 'design'? If so, care to explain why?
Permalink for comment 517216
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Design is bollocks
by Soulbender on Sun 6th May 2012 05:14 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Design is bollocks"
Soulbender
Member since:
2005-08-18

Can people seriously tell the difference between all four of them and an iPhone


Sure, I can but who in their right mind makes so much noise about such minor differences. Seriously, anyone considering the S3 a monstrosity of ugliness need to get their head checked. And get a life.

"consumerist who has good design sense about a mobile phone"


I think "good" is questionable.

Reply Parent Score: 3