Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 8th May 2012 23:42 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Permalink for comment 517460
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-06-24
Even though I'm concerned with security, I find this really interesting in term of monitoring / consumption prediction. I imagine a statistical analysis of all those sensors could lead to a lot of optimizations in the way power/water/whatever is distributed, constructed and so on.
Now, regarding the security, I'd say that if it is only used for _monitoring_, security is probably not such a big deal. I mean there are still risk that some hacker fake the statistics or spy someone's power consumption, but I don't see any major security risk there. Plus, if my city would put such a system in place, I'd except the data to be public anyway.
Now, if it's really used to actually control the distributions, it's a completely different story.
Ah yeah, it has too many buzzwords too, but I guess they had to find a way to sell it :-D