Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 9th May 2012 18:16 UTC
Permalink for comment 517500
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-10-12
ultrabooks predate the air by many years
intel just came up with a name for them in 2011
you can take a look at the vaio x505 from 2004
and sony weren't the only ones building such laptops back then
http://www.zdnet.co.uk/reviews/ultraportables/2004/09/02/sony-vaio-... "
This is the point I was trying to make I was just too bored to look around for previous designs.
The Air was a new form factor and the fact that the majority of the components inside are dictated by Intel has no correlation to the overall look and design of the laptop.
It's Apple which designs the packaging and it was Apple that decided what was going to be included IN THE AIR. If you go back to its introduction there were countless articles criticising the lack of various components inside the laptop. These decisions were all made by Apple not by Intel.
The shape and the design is derived by Apple and these others vendors are merely borrowing/copying it (because it's the right thing to do).
Get over it
PS: Thom you do know what a fraction means right? 9/10 is a fraction as is 1/7.