Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 10th May 2012 05:00 UTC
Legal "[...] despite Oracle pointing out the commercial success of Android - which would tend to weigh against a finding of fair use - it was clear that Judge Alsup wasn't inclined to side with the company. The judge even scolded Oracle counsel Michael Jacobs when he first argued his case, pointing out that the company's legal team had insisted on a jury trial and that 'now we got their verdict and you want something else'." Someone must be having a bad day.
Permalink for comment 517564
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Nine lines of code...
by looncraz on Thu 10th May 2012 06:36 UTC
looncraz
Member since:
2005-07-24

It all comes down to NINE (9) lines of code, now...

A freaking array range-check in java, no less.

And, get this, the programmer accused of doing the copying is the same programmer that wrote the original code...

Perhaps, just perhaps, we need to extend, by law, forced forgiveness of these types of situations. Still require the end of use of the copyrighted work, but not permit any punitive damages when it is quite obvious the code could have been easily recreated by simple incidental recollection.

I wrote a program many years ago to check for the death of a thread, I was contacted that my code appeared to be a near direct copy of code I had never even seen. My variable names, indents, spacing, and more was apparently spot-on with the code.

How could that happen?

Well, I learned to program by reading the public APIs, example applications, and documentation from the same source as the program I apparently cloned so closely. ...Seems only natural that my code would be so similar.

As a result, I changed my coding style quite drastically... something which I've had to undo in recent years while once again attempting to code in the public eye.

--The loon

Reply Score: 15