Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 10th May 2012 23:26 UTC
Permalink for comment 517776
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-12-21
Let's face it.. Microsoft as the ultimate services platform just isn't there. People don't use Microsoft for everything... and a lot of it is because Microsoft wasn't 1st to market with an idea, or their implementation was just plain lousy.
Metro works best IF you are riding the whole Microsoft services stack. It's not that you can't use other things... it's just that by defaut, what comes with it is designed to present a very integrated experience IF you are using the Microsoft services stack...
So.. probably just stating the obvious, but one of the things Metro is attempting to do is to bring users back into the Microsoft fold when it comes to Internet based services they offer. And I suppose you can't blame them for trying.