Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 11th May 2012 22:57 UTC
Permalink for comment 517938
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-12-17
That's an apples/oranges comparison; the premise of the discussion is Windows 7 and Windows 8 GUI design, and the point is that to accomplish the same tasks on Windows 8 requires more User input and interface manipulation then on Windows 7 -- more mouse and/or key presses, more movement through more interface discontinuity, more window manipulation, just to get to the same place.
Windows 8 is NOT an improvement, it's NOT progress in OS or interface design toward making the interface more transparent, seamless, and low drag with respect to actually using a PC to do anything productive. As a passive play-toy, or an end in itself in form without function I'm sure it's just 'Ducky'...
Edited 2012-05-13 18:25 UTC