Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 14th May 2012 15:20 UTC
Windows "Senate Judiciary Committee staffers plan to take a look at allegations that Microsoft has made it difficult for competing Web browsers to run on a certain version of Windows, an aide to Antitrust subcommittee Chairman Herb Kohl told The Hill Thursday." Good. We have to nip this in the bud, and with a bit of luck, it alerts Washington to the iOS situation as well. More browser competition equals a better web - mobile devices aren't magically exempt from this just because they have no keyboard. As simple as that.
Permalink for comment 518098
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
so iPad, which dominates the mobile market
by MollyC on Mon 14th May 2012 22:27 UTC
Member since:

continues to get a free ride, while an OS with zero marketshare is put under scrutiny.

As I said in the previous story, anyone that needs a tablet that runs Firefox/Chrome and also runs Metro apps is free to get a Windows 8 tablet rather than a WinRT one. Windows 8 tablets will serve that purpose.

Take away the Metro requirement in the above scenario, and the user is free to get an Android tablet, which will run Chrome/Firefox, rather than a WinRT tablet.

The only tablets that won't run Chrome/Firefox are iPads and WinRT tablets. The former gets a free ride to do whatever it wants (despite a huge marketshare); the latter lacks the market force to compel someone to choose it over BOTH Android and Windows 8 (both of which will run Chrome/Firefox). So what's the deal here?

Edited 2012-05-14 22:34 UTC

Reply Score: 4