Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 14th May 2012 18:28 UTC
Permalink for comment 518339
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-12-29
So my binary-only Linux servers and desktops are in violation of the GPL then? Of course not.
Apple would just have to offer source packages for download via the App store or some other means. "
You have completely missed the point. In order to install on an iOS device you need to digitally sign the binary. A developer license provides you with this certificate. If a user buys an app and gets the source package they still do not have the capability of installing it on their device. Therefore the GPL cannot be upheld. Your servers and desktops are not in violation because you can take the source code and build/install the software in the same way the binary you have received was built / installed.