Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 16th May 2012 21:17 UTC
Permalink for comment 518523
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:39 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 19:39 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 11:43 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-14
Plus Porting the fixed graphical mockup to a flexible size screen is not straightforward (cost more money)
Yes, the money thing is real, but seriously, its not technically hard to do. It is creatively and emotionally hard for designers to allow for their creation to not be rendered at a fixed width screen size. I don't really care if there is a tad more blank space between elements or the relative position between elements changes on different screen size. HTML was created with the idea that it would be rendered differently on different screens. Its the professional designers that have mostly screwed that promise up.