Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 19th May 2012 00:01 UTC
Permalink for comment 518757
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-09-02
Granted, the primary purpose of the interpreter is to manipulate 16-bit pointers on an 8-bit system, but I have to wonder:
If BrainF*ck is Turing-complete, and Conway's Game of Life can simulate a Turing-complete system, can Sweet16 also be considered Turing-complete?
It almost gives me a headache. Conway's Game of Life, running a BrainF*ck interpreter, implementing a Sweet16 virtual machine. Owwww....