Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 24th May 2012 22:34 UTC
Permalink for comment 519393
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-09-01
Processing 250k requests a week (something that can't go without human intervention) must cost a fortune, another blow to Google.
Who's gonna pay for that? As MS is competitor to google in search space they could easily use this mechanism to abuse them and artificially make other se gain competitive advantage.
That's the huge loophole I see in this legislation, as it may potentially make the whole search business commercially non-viable. Just mentioning something even if it's illegal shouldn't be punishable, that a totalitarian measure.
Edited 2012-05-25 10:28 UTC