Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 25th May 2012 14:55 UTC
General Unix James Hague: "But all the little bits of complexity, all those cases where indecision caused one option that probably wasn't even needed in the first place to be replaced by two options, all those bad choices that were never remedied for fear of someone somewhere having to change a line of code... They slowly accreted until it all got out of control, and we got comfortable with systems that were impossible to understand." Counterpoint by John Cook: "Some of the growth in complexity is understandable. It's a lot easier to maintain an orthogonal design when your software isn't being used. Software that gets used becomes less orthogonal and develops diagonal shortcuts." If there's ever been a system in dire need of a complete redesign, it's UNIX and its derivatives. A mess doesn't even begin to describe it (for those already frantically reaching for the comment button, note that this applies to other systems as well).
Permalink for comment 519445
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
by SonicMetalMan on Fri 25th May 2012 17:11 UTC
Member since:

I guess I do not fully understand the issue. You malign UNIX for being too complex, so what? Do Apple users care that a Macbook is BSD at its core? No, it just works.

That's what UNIX is to me. It just works. I have no concerns about the differences with /bin and /usr/bin as those decisions were made long before I delved into the digital world.

If a large group of users decide that UNIX is too fragmented then that group should create an alternative to UNIX and just leave the old guy alone.

Because it just works.

Reply Score: 6