Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 25th May 2012 14:55 UTC
General Unix James Hague: "But all the little bits of complexity, all those cases where indecision caused one option that probably wasn't even needed in the first place to be replaced by two options, all those bad choices that were never remedied for fear of someone somewhere having to change a line of code... They slowly accreted until it all got out of control, and we got comfortable with systems that were impossible to understand." Counterpoint by John Cook: "Some of the growth in complexity is understandable. It's a lot easier to maintain an orthogonal design when your software isn't being used. Software that gets used becomes less orthogonal and develops diagonal shortcuts." If there's ever been a system in dire need of a complete redesign, it's UNIX and its derivatives. A mess doesn't even begin to describe it (for those already frantically reaching for the comment button, note that this applies to other systems as well).
Permalink for comment 519447
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: UNIX?!
by Thom_Holwerda on Fri 25th May 2012 17:30 UTC in reply to "UNIX?!"
Thom_Holwerda
Member since:
2005-06-29

Do Apple users care that a Macbook is BSD at its core? No, it just works.


I once explained this insidious habit of calling stacking layer upon layer "fixing things" (instead of actually fixing the root issues) to a non-geek friend as such:

Saying that Mac OS X addresses the complexity from UNIX is like saying large sunglasses and extensive clothing fixes the issue of a woman getting physically abused by her husband.

Edited 2012-05-25 17:31 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 5