Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 23rd May 2012 16:13 UTC
Permalink for comment 519560
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-18
Smoke and mirrors... I hate to tell you but the job of a CEO of a publicly traded company is to make money for its investors, and well, that is it really. If you don't make them more money they fire you. The people who own the stock own the company. If you feel bad about what happened to HP you should blame HP (as in Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard) - no one put a gun to their head and made them go public... "
You miss the point. My point is stop using stock market voodoo to judge a CEO's performance. Yes, CEO are supposed to bump up stock prices. But as we've established elsewhere, they're illusions.
Did I blame Carly for HP's current problems? No. They were problems under her tenure that speak for themselves. And how did she grow HP's PC division? By buying Compaq. You'll argue that's a legitimate success. I argue it's not a sustainable kind, and these kinds of quick fixes do not fix the problems of the organization.