Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 25th May 2012 19:09 UTC
Permalink for comment 519643
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-09-22
As I see it:
Mozilla receives a lot more money than they spend. (the old financial report is now a 404 page not found, so the next sentence is from memory). In 2010 they spend, I think, only 1/4 of the money they received.
Every year since 2009 or 2008 at least they've received more money.
In 2010 they already had almost as much cash in the bank (or other financial assets) than they received from searchegines that year.
Google can't stop giving money to Mozilla, because Mozilla might put Bing as the default search engine in their browser.
So I think Mozilla can run for years without any financial help from anyone and Mozilla is a non profit with the goal to improve the web and keep it open for everyone.
Opera is a business and also receives money from Google, Microsoft, Yandex and so on.
Does that make Opera less or more independent than Mozilla ?
I know one thing, Facebook can't but Mozilla.