Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 28th May 2012 19:25 UTC
Permalink for comment 519733
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2012-05-28
You seem to have completely misunderstood the purpose of such a law. The point is not that women need help because they are inherently not as capable as men, the point is to overcome the rather pervasive prejudice against them in IT to showcase that they are, in fact, perfectly capable. Unfortunately, without such a law, they will not be given the chance. Women don't need help because they are incapable of doing the job as well as men, they need help to combat discrimination (which may not even be conscious, I will add). Let's face it, technology is a boys club, and it has nothing to do with ability.
Ensuring that women get into the workplace is the only way to eliminate preconceptions and prejudices, and encourage girls to pursue a career dominated by men without fear of being held back because of their gender.
So while I understand where you are coming from in this post, you've unfortunately completely missed the boat.