Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 28th May 2012 19:25 UTC
Permalink for comment 519813
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-22
Because, obviously, there's no such thing as discrimination against men.
At least that's what the local feministas say in response to reports that men may be victims of domestic violence. Under Philippine law, only women and children could ever be victims of DV (cf. Anti-Violence Against Women and Their Children Law). The original bill was worded to be gender-neutral, but it didn't pass on the premise that allowing men to considered as victims would mean that women would be falsely accused of being abusive. Which is funny, since the "women and children only" definition means that men claiming to be abused (by women) are automatically suspected of being the real abuser.