Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 31st May 2012 11:11 UTC
Permalink for comment 520113
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-06-24
Although I think Fedora is doing the right thing (the other option being to let the user down - which won't do any good), I had the same reaction as you upon reading the article.
It's not even the 99$, it's the fact that in the future, alternative OS will have to be approved by Microsoft to be able to boot on hardware that people *bought*.
I sincerely hope the EU gets an investigation going about Microsoft on this topic. If this is not monopoly abuse, I don't know what this is.
Btw, I'm looking forward to the hacking conference following the Windows 8 release that will reveal that a way around this whole signing shit has been found.