Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 31st May 2012 12:24 UTC
Windows "Microsoft has been furiously ripping out legacy code in Windows 8 that would have enabled third parties to bring back the Start button, Start Menu, and other software bits that could have made this new OS look and work like its predecessor. In fact, I've seen that several well-known UI hacks that worked fine with the Windows 8 Consumer Preview are no longer functional in the coming Release Preview. And those with hopes that Microsoft would allow businesses, at least, to boot directly to the desktop should prepare for disappointment. That feature not only isn't happening, it's being removed from Windows Server 12 (Windows 8's stable mate) as well." When you buy a new machine later this year, you will use Metro, an environment wholly inferior, incomplete, and not at all ready to replace the traditional desktop in any way, shape, or form. Whether you like it or not.
Permalink for comment 520183
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Comment by AnythingButVista
by AnythingButVista on Thu 31st May 2012 17:34 UTC
Member since:

First, I don't see anything wrong with businesses skipping Windows 8 until Microsoft gets Metro fully fleshed and ready for productive prime time. And I think Microsoft can enhance Metro enough to make it productive, but I don't see that happening until Windows 9 or in the best case, Windows 8 SP 2.

I still remember the people's resistance when Windows 95 came in. I also remember similar resistance when Windows XP was first released with the cheesiest UI ever to come out in an operating system. So yes, resistance to Metro is totally normal (and expected by Microsoft). I for once am not a big fan of tabletizing my desktop but I know Microsoft can pull this one off, even if it takes up to Windows 9 to get a fully-productive and more customizable Metro environment. In the meantime, the old desktop is still there to run data entry and other complex applications that don't fit with Metro in its current form.

FYI: Vista sucked, not because of the changes in the UI but because it dragged its feet on machines where XP flew and as demonstrated by Windows 7 running much faster than Vista (albeit understandably slower than XP) on the same hardware, Vista's excessive weight was totally unnecessary.

What worries me about Windows 8 and what doesn't get me at all excited to adopt it, (I haven't even bothered downloading the preview), isn't Metro but the new lock-in tactics employed by Microsoft: blocking dual-booting alternative OS in ARM hardware, only allowing Metro apps in their app store and disallowing application sideloading of Metro apps. That's the kind of OS jail I don't want to be trapped in.

Reply Score: 3