
"Microsoft has been
furiously ripping out legacy code in Windows 8 that would have enabled third parties to bring back the Start button, Start Menu, and other software bits that could have made this new OS look and work like its predecessor. In fact, I've seen that several well-known UI hacks that worked fine with the Windows 8 Consumer Preview are no longer functional in the coming Release Preview. And those with hopes that Microsoft would allow businesses, at least, to boot directly to the desktop should prepare for disappointment. That feature not only isn't happening, it's being removed from Windows Server 12 (Windows 8's stable mate) as well." When you buy a new machine later this year, you
will use Metro, an environment wholly inferior, incomplete, and not at all ready to replace the traditional desktop in any way, shape, or form. Whether you like it or not.
Member since:
2009-07-18
Vista didn't suck - that's mainly a perception due to the UAC, which was a necessary evil.
Yes, it wasn't as performant as XP. It also had several massive rewrites in its layers, and a better interactive model between the components. Win7 is Vista optimized, more or less, with a few enhancements.
"
MS was trying to update the UI (first time you could even have real buffered windows without the 'classic' Windows flicker - jeez, took them long enough, but credit is due for them at least finally doing it), did very visible UI updates only halfway (like the "integrated" control panel where you'd click for an option and immediately get an old version of a sub-panel in its own window anyway), updated the internals - in the process replacing them with very un-optimized code (as you say as well), broke their old drivers in the process, and iced the cake with incredibly intrusive UAC.
Unfortunately they also pushed it out the door that way instead of finishing their alpha/beta cycle. I'd have to go with Vista sucking.