Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 31st May 2012 15:19 UTC
Permalink for comment 520333
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-04-25
If they want to get rid of "pirated" content, they should consider making legal use of their copyrighted material more convenient than illegal use. As it stands now, while it's mildly less expensive to violate copyright, it's HUGELY more convenient - no DRM, no enforced lectures on copyright, no restrictions on the devices on which I can use the material, backups... It's astounding to me that ANYone goes the legal route.
(Disclaimer: I go the legal route as a moral obligation - except that I purchase much less copyrighted material than in my younger days. And when I do, it's usually second-hand.
For example, I wanted to read "Atlas Shrugged" to better understand Ron Paul in the current US election cycle. An eBook version is $15, and is limited to one device type.
After long searching, I finally just bought a used paperback for $6, for which Rand's estate got $0, though I would have readily paid them $10 for a PDF. For people who champion capitalism, they really don't seem to understand it very well. *Sigh*)