Linked by nfeske on Wed 30th May 2012 11:30 UTC
Permalink for comment 520356
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-05-27
Fiasco.OC is one of the kernels that can be used at the core of the Genode system. But it is only one among several kernels. Alternatively, you may opt to use NOVA, OKL4, Pistachio, or even Linux. Each of those kernels has different pros and cons. It is up to the user of Genode to pick the kernel that fits best for her/him.
The driver API is, in the line of all Genode's API, a C++ interface. In addition, there exists a C wrapper called DDE kit, which is primarily intended to ease the porting of device drivers (typically written in C) from other platforms.
Switching from GCC to LLVM is not planned. From what I gathered so far, LLVM is pretty intriguing and I am tempted to explore it. But on the other hand, we are actually quite happy with our current GCC-based tool chain.
Do you have compelling and tangible arguments for investing development time on switching Genode to LLVM over the many other topics on our road map?