Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 3rd Jun 2012 22:04 UTC
Permalink for comment 520660
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-22
People talk about the Apple RDF. Well, the microsoft one is even worse.
The 'la-la-la-la I can't hear you' attitude of microsoft speak volumes about how much they care about the hundresds of millions of users (say 10%) who will/are mightly peed off about the introduction of Aero.
I know that my employer is already thinking long and hard about not using windows any longer once Server 2008 stops being sold. This means no more server licenses. No more SQLServer Licenses, RHEL & Oracle here we come.
On the desktop front, we have just finished rolling out Windows 7. Many of us virtualize the corporate build and install Linux in its place already.
Notes and LibreOffice are making the need to use windows less and less.
Even some of my friends who work for MS are dispairing at the thought of Metro. They are already hearing dissent from their customers. This is a step too far by far.
If they were to make Windows 8 have both classic and Metro then I am sure that over time it would gain acceptance.
Even those masters of the RDF, Apple didn't force OSX onto their users. The kept MacOS-9 going for sometime after the introduction of OSX. will MS learn a lesson here?
Sadly I doubt it.