Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 3rd Jun 2012 22:04 UTC
Permalink for comment 520807
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-16
I think Thom's proposed Metro tweaks would be a real improvement over the current mess, but it would still be painfully limited compared with the window management we already have.
I've tried tiling window managers and found that they simply don't suit the way I work. No matter how Metro apps could be split, I'd still value the flexibility and versatility of individually moveable and resizeable windows. Being restricted to tiled windows would make many of my day to day tasks significantly less efficient.
In a way I'd be more worried about the future of Windows if Microsoft did improve Metro in the way Thom suggests. The more usable Metro becomes, the more of a sure thing it is that the applications I need will move to it, and the more likely it is that the desktop will ultimately disappear.
As it is, Metro is so painfully limited that a significant number of users are sure to hate it. That makes it more likely that the essential software I use will keep supporting the fully functional desktop.