Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 5th Jun 2012 10:50 UTC
Permalink for comment 520916
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-11-06
@Jeffrey. They did exactly the same as the Americans: get all German scientist and material you can lay your hands on and start from there.
Apart from that, the Russians were a lot more efficient than Americans. Whereas the Americans reinvented the wheel every time another company was granted the project, the Russians built steadily further on their experience, under the same lead engineer throughout ~2 decades. Which is why the ISS is nowadays supplied by the Russians, not the Americans.
I think you are mistaken with the atomic bomb.
Edited 2012-06-05 20:10 UTC