Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 3rd Jun 2012 22:04 UTC
Permalink for comment 521092
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-16
You obviously have no response to the criticism of Metro if all you can do is dismiss it like this. It doesn't say much for Metro if even the most obsequious Windows fanboy on OS News can't actually defend it and refute the complaints people have raised.
The last I checked, discussing the pros and cons of various operating systems was one of the main reasons for this site's existence. Just telling someone not to use one if they have a criticism of it would be a lazy and pointless response even if the commenter had no intention of using it.
As it is, I need to use a variety of Windows software and have to use Windows at work. If the desktop is phased out, or the software I need moves to Metro, then I'll have little choice but to suffer its cripplware tablet interface. Of course I'm going to voice my opinion about something that might end up seriously damaging my productivity.