Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 8th Jun 2012 23:07 UTC
Permalink for comment 521414
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-03-11
I am very sorry for your loss.
This is an article I enjoyed a lot for the history in it. I too used to have a copy of Encyclopedias from about that time (my father's set). It was interesting to look through them and see things which had changed (space race, computers, maps) and things which had remained largely the same biology, chemistry, older history.
If I may, I found the comments on science vs religion interesting, though I think I'm less surprised about the books having accurate scientific information. From what I'm seen fundamentalist dogma seems to be more wide spread and more aggressive now than it was 50 or 100 years ago. Back then I don't think there was nearly the perceived divide between faith and science that we have now.
Thanks for an interesting and personal article.