Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 8th Jun 2012 23:07 UTC
Permalink for comment 521458
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-06-28
Well all this science vs religion nonsense is a new thing. Gregor Mendel for example was monk and even though we Charles Darwin is the father of the evolution theory Mendel discovered how inheritance works and described it in great detail.
People somehow started to mix up science with believe. There are a lot of scientists that are theist, the Vatican even has their own observatory and they add a lot to science.
One also shouldn't mix up Christianity with Creationism. There are a lot things that go wrong with church and I don't believe in a god either, but saying that someone who does isn't able to do science is just completely wrong.
It even goes further than that. Saying there is no god without proving it is from a scientific point of view just as wrong as stating their is one without proving it.
Also people, scientist, priest or both are in general wrong about most of the stuff they find out, even if they consider them proven.
Basing your moral decision on any of these, at least for me doesn't sound rational (if moral decisions can be rational at all).
Nevertheless. Great article!
(and sorry about your loss)