Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 10th Jun 2012 22:36 UTC
Permalink for comment 521690
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-01-28
darknexus,
"Sandboxing doesn't help in this situation. Even if a piece of software can't get outside the sandbox, if you voluntarily run it inside of your browser, it has access to whichever features the parent process does."
That's probably the heart of the disagreement right there. It's not really the case that a sandboxed extension has to have the same level of access as the parent process.